Home / LEV Testing / Guide
LEV testing - budgeting
For a small business, LEV compliance can feel like an occasional, unpredictable cost that lands out of nowhere. It does not have to. The elements are known and the cost is largely predictable - so with a little planning, LEV compliance becomes a budgeted annual line rather than an unwelcome surprise.
The short answer
For an SME, annual LEV compliance is a largely predictable cost with a few elements: the thorough examination and test itself (required at least every fourteen months), a sensible margin for any remedial work the test identifies, and the small ongoing cost of maintenance and keeping records. Budgeting for these turns LEV compliance from an occasional surprise into a planned annual line. The core cost is the testing, which is known and can be scheduled and budgeted; the rest is a margin and modest upkeep.
It's more predictable than it feels
For a small business, LEV compliance can feel like an unpredictable expense - something that comes up now and then and costs whatever it costs. But that feeling usually comes from not having planned for it, not from the cost being genuinely unpredictable. In fact the elements of LEV compliance are known and the cost is largely foreseeable: there is a required test on a known cycle, a possibility of remedial work, and some modest ongoing upkeep. Once these are understood, LEV compliance can be budgeted like any other regular business cost.
So the first step is to see LEV compliance as a planned annual line rather than an occasional surprise. The main driver - the thorough examination and test - is required on a known schedule, so it can be anticipated and budgeted well ahead. The other elements are smaller and can be provided for with sensible margins. Treating LEV compliance as a predictable annual cost, planned into the budget, removes the surprise and the scramble - which is what makes it manageable for an SME rather than a recurring unwelcome shock.
The core cost: testing
The core, and most predictable, element is the thorough examination and test itself. LEV controlling a health hazard must be thoroughly examined and tested by a competent person at least every fourteen months, so this is a required, recurring cost on a known cycle. Because it is required and scheduled, it is the easiest part to budget: you know it is coming, roughly when, and it can be planned and priced in advance. For most SMEs this is the main LEV compliance cost, and the one to build the budget around.
The cost of the test depends mainly on the size and complexity of the system - the number of extraction points being the main driver, as each point is assessed individually. So an SME with a small system of a few points has a modest, predictable testing cost; a larger system costs more but is still predictable given the number of points. The point is that this core cost is knowable in advance - you can get it quoted and budget for it as a planned expense on the fourteen-month cycle, which makes the largest part of LEV compliance the most straightforward to plan for.
A margin for remedial work
The less predictable element is remedial work - if the test finds the system is not performing adequately, repairs may be needed to bring it back to controlling exposure. This is harder to budget precisely, because you do not know in advance whether the test will find a problem or what it might be. But it can be provided for with a sensible margin: setting aside a reasonable allowance for possible remedial work means that if the test does identify something, the cost is covered rather than a shock.
A well-maintained system is less likely to need significant remedial work, so keeping the LEV in good order between tests both reduces the risk of a failure and helps keep this element small. But budgeting a margin for it is prudent, because a failed test that identifies necessary repairs is a real possibility, and the repairs are not optional - a system that is not controlling exposure has to be put right. So the honest approach is to budget the predictable testing cost plus a sensible margin for potential remedial work, so that whatever the test finds, the compliance cost is provided for rather than a surprise.
Ongoing upkeep and records
The final elements are modest and ongoing: the maintenance that keeps the LEV working between tests, and the keeping of records. Maintenance - replacing consumables like filters, keeping the system clean, fixing small faults - is a small continuing cost, but a worthwhile one, because keeping the system in good order reduces the risk of a failed test and expensive remedial work. So the modest spend on upkeep is partly an investment in keeping the larger costs down.
Keeping records - the test reports and the compliance history - is a very small cost but an important discipline, because the documentation is the evidence of compliance for an inspector or an occupational health claim. So the ongoing elements are the small, regular cost of maintenance and the minimal cost of keeping records. Neither is large, but both belong in the budget as part of a complete picture of annual LEV compliance: the core testing cost, a margin for remedial work, and the modest continuing upkeep and record-keeping. Together they make LEV compliance a fully planned annual cost.
The takeaway
For an SME, annual LEV compliance is a largely predictable cost made of known elements: the thorough examination and test on its fourteen-month cycle (the core, most predictable cost, driven mainly by the number of extraction points), a sensible margin for any remedial work the test might identify, and the modest continuing costs of maintenance and keeping records. Understood this way, it is budgetable like any other regular business expense.
So the way to make LEV compliance manageable is to plan it into the budget as an annual line rather than treat it as an occasional surprise. Budget the predictable testing cost, set aside a reasonable margin for possible remedial work, and provide for the small ongoing upkeep and record-keeping. Done that way, LEV compliance stops being an unwelcome shock and becomes a planned, controlled cost - which is exactly what it should be for a small business, given how predictable its elements actually are.
Questions
A largely predictable amount made of known elements - the thorough examination and test on its fourteen-month cycle (the core cost), a margin for any remedial work the test identifies, and modest continuing costs of maintenance and records. It can be budgeted like any regular expense.
The thorough examination and test itself, required at least every fourteen months by a competent person. It is the core and most predictable cost - required, scheduled, and quotable in advance - and the one to build the budget around. Its size depends mainly on the number of extraction points.
With a sensible margin, since you cannot know in advance whether the test will find a problem. Setting aside a reasonable allowance means that if the test identifies necessary repairs, the cost is covered rather than a shock. A well-maintained system reduces the likelihood.
Because each extraction point is assessed individually in a thorough examination, so more points means more work. An SME with a small system of a few points has a modest, predictable cost; a larger system costs more but is still predictable given the point count.
The maintenance that keeps the LEV working between tests - filters, cleaning, small fault fixes - which is a small continuing cost, and the minimal cost of keeping records. Both are modest but belong in the budget, and good upkeep reduces the risk of a failed test.
Plan it into the budget as an annual line - the predictable testing cost, a margin for possible remedial work, and modest upkeep and record-keeping. Planned this way, LEV compliance becomes a controlled cost rather than an occasional unwelcome shock.
We test LEV on the required cycle at a clear, quotable cost - so a small business can budget its LEV compliance as a planned annual line rather than an unpredictable surprise.
