Home / Kitchen Deep Cleaning / Guide
Kitchen deep cleaning - health and safety
A workshop can be a noisy place, and noise at work can permanently damage hearing - noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus that do not heal. Reducing noise exposure means controlling the noise at source where you can, limiting exposure, and providing hearing protection, under the noise regulations. Here is how to reduce noise exposure in a workshop. This is general information, not health-and-safety advice.
The short answer
A workshop - with its machinery, tools and processes - can be a noisy place, and noise at work is a serious health hazard, because it can permanently damage hearing: noise-induced hearing loss (a gradual, permanent loss of hearing from exposure to loud noise over time) and tinnitus (ringing in the ears), which do not heal. So reducing noise exposure protects workers' hearing from permanent damage. It is regulated: the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to assess and reduce the risk from noise, and set trigger levels - the lower exposure action value (80 dB(A) daily), at which employers must assess the risk and provide information and training and make hearing protection available; the upper exposure action value (85 dB(A) daily), at which they must reduce exposure through controls, provide and enforce hearing protection, designate hearing protection zones, and provide health surveillance; and the exposure limit value (87 dB(A), taking account of hearing protection), which must not be exceeded. Reducing noise exposure follows a hierarchy - controlling at source first, then limiting exposure, then hearing protection. Control at source: the most effective approach is to reduce the noise at its source - using quieter equipment and tools, quieter processes and methods, and engineering controls (enclosing or isolating noisy machinery, damping vibration, fitting silencers, using barriers) to reduce the noise produced. Reducing the noise itself is better than protecting against it, so it comes first. Limit exposure: where noise cannot be fully controlled at source, limit workers' exposure to it - reducing the time spent in the noise (job rotation, limiting time on noisy tasks), increasing distance from the noise, and organising the work and workshop to reduce exposure (separating noisy processes, scheduling). Hearing protection: where the noise still exposes workers (particularly at or above the upper action value), provide hearing protection (ear defenders, earplugs) that reduces their exposure, and ensure it is used - hearing protection is a control where the noise cannot be reduced enough by other means, and is required at the upper action value. Plus health surveillance (hearing checks) where there is a risk, to monitor for early signs of damage. So reducing noise exposure in a workshop means controlling the noise at source first, then limiting exposure, then providing hearing protection, with health surveillance - under the noise regulations - to protect workers' hearing from the permanent damage noise causes. This is a workshop and industrial matter more than a kitchen one; a commercial kitchen is not typically a high-noise environment. This is general information, not health-and-safety advice; follow the regulations and HSE guidance.
Key points
Noise damages hearing
The reason to reduce noise exposure in a workshop is that noise at work can permanently damage hearing - a serious and irreversible harm. Exposure to loud noise over time causes noise-induced hearing loss: a gradual, permanent loss of hearing that builds up from the exposure and does not heal (the damage to the hearing is permanent). It can also cause tinnitus (persistent ringing or noise in the ears), which is also often permanent and distressing. So workshop noise, if not controlled, can leave workers with permanent hearing loss and tinnitus - a real, lasting harm to their health and quality of life. This is why reducing noise exposure matters: it protects workers' hearing from permanent, irreversible damage. And like other cumulative occupational harms, noise-induced hearing loss builds up gradually, so it can be developing unnoticed until the damage is done - which is why controlling the exposure (before the damage) matters.
Because it is a recognised, serious and preventable harm, noise at work is regulated: the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to assess the risk from noise and reduce it, and set exposure values that trigger specific duties. The values (daily or weekly personal noise exposure) are: the lower exposure action value (80 dB(A)), at which the employer must assess the risk, provide information and training, and make hearing protection available on request; the upper exposure action value (85 dB(A)), at which the employer must take action to reduce exposure (through controls), provide hearing protection and ensure it is used, designate hearing protection zones, and provide health surveillance; and the exposure limit value (87 dB(A), which takes account of any reduction from hearing protection), which must not be exceeded. So the regulations set a framework: assess the noise, and act according to the levels - with duties increasing at the action values and a limit not to be exceeded. So there is a legal duty to assess and reduce noise exposure, structured around these values. The following sections cover how to reduce the exposure - controlling at source, limiting exposure, and hearing protection - which is both the legal requirement and what protects workers' hearing. This is general information, not health-and-safety advice.
Control at source
The most effective way to reduce noise exposure, and the first in the hierarchy, is to control the noise at source - reducing the noise itself, rather than just protecting against it. Reducing the noise produced is better than relying on protecting workers from it, because it reduces the exposure for everyone and does not depend on protection being used correctly. So the first approach is to reduce the noise at its source. This can be done through: quieter equipment and tools (choosing or replacing noisy equipment with quieter alternatives - quieter machines, tools and processes, where available); quieter processes and methods (doing the work in ways that produce less noise); and engineering controls to reduce the noise from the source - enclosing or isolating noisy machinery (so the noise is contained), damping vibration (which produces noise), fitting silencers or mufflers, using barriers or screens to block the noise, and maintaining equipment (worn equipment often noisier). So controlling at source means reducing the noise the workshop produces, through quieter equipment and processes and engineering controls.
This is the priority because it addresses the noise at its origin, reducing the exposure at source for everyone in the workshop, which is more effective and reliable than protecting individuals from noise that is still being produced. Under the regulations, employers must reduce exposure (particularly at the upper action value) by measures other than hearing protection where reasonably practicable - so controlling at source is not just best practice but part of the legal expectation, with hearing protection as a control where the noise cannot be reduced enough by other means. So the first and most effective step in reducing noise exposure is to control the noise at source - quieter equipment and processes, and engineering controls to reduce the noise produced. This reduces the noise everyone is exposed to, tackling the problem at its root. So look first at how to reduce the noise the workshop produces - which equipment and processes are noisy, and how they could be made quieter (quieter alternatives, enclosure, damping, maintenance) - as the priority in reducing noise exposure. Controlling at source is the foundation; the other measures (limiting exposure, hearing protection) build on it where the noise cannot be fully controlled. So reduce the noise itself first, as the most effective protection for workers' hearing.
Limit exposure
Where the noise cannot be fully controlled at source, the next step is to limit workers' exposure to it - reducing how much noise they are exposed to, through time, distance and organisation. Because noise exposure depends on both the loudness and the duration, reducing the duration reduces the exposure - so limiting the time workers spend in the noise (or on noisy tasks) reduces their exposure. This can be done through job rotation (rotating workers so no one spends too long in the noise), limiting time on noisy tasks, and scheduling noisy work to minimise exposure. So reducing the time in noise is one way to limit exposure. Distance also helps: noise reduces with distance from the source, so increasing the distance between workers and noisy equipment (where the work allows) reduces their exposure - keeping workers away from noise sources where possible.
Organising the work and workshop to reduce exposure is the broader approach: separating noisy processes from where people work (so fewer people are exposed, and less), positioning noisy equipment away from work areas, scheduling noisy work when fewer people are around, and generally organising the workshop and work to minimise the noise workers are exposed to. So limiting exposure combines reducing time in noise (rotation, limiting noisy-task time), increasing distance (keeping away from sources), and organising the work and workshop to reduce exposure. These reduce how much noise workers actually receive, even where the noise itself cannot be fully eliminated at source. So after controlling at source, limit the exposure - through time, distance and organisation - as the next step in reducing noise exposure. Together, controlling at source (reducing the noise) and limiting exposure (reducing how much reaches workers) reduce the noise workers are exposed to by tackling both the noise and the exposure. Where these still leave workers exposed to harmful noise, hearing protection is the further control - covered next. So limiting exposure is the second tier: reducing the exposure to the noise that remains after source control, through time, distance and organisation.
Hearing protection and surveillance
Where the noise still exposes workers to harmful levels - after controlling at source and limiting exposure - hearing protection is the further control, and it is required at the upper exposure action value. Hearing protection (ear defenders/muffs or earplugs) reduces the noise reaching the worker's ear, protecting their hearing where the noise cannot be reduced enough by other means. Under the regulations, hearing protection must be made available on request at the lower action value (80 dB(A)) and must be provided and its use enforced at the upper action value (85 dB(A)), with hearing protection zones designated. So where workers are exposed to noise at or above these levels, hearing protection is provided (and, at the upper value, its use required) to reduce their exposure. For hearing protection to work, it has to be suitable (adequate for the noise level), properly used (worn correctly, whenever in the noise), and maintained - so providing it is not enough; its correct use has to be ensured. So hearing protection is the control where the noise still exposes workers after the other measures, required at the upper action value, and it must be suitable and properly used.
It is important that hearing protection is the last resort in the hierarchy, not the first - controlling the noise at source and limiting exposure come first, because they reduce the noise itself, whereas hearing protection only protects individuals from noise that is still there (and depends on being used correctly). So hearing protection complements, but does not replace, controlling the noise - it is for the noise that remains after the other controls. Alongside the controls, health surveillance is required where there is a risk (particularly at the upper action value) - hearing checks (audiometry) to monitor workers' hearing and catch early signs of noise-induced hearing loss, so that action can be taken before the damage becomes severe. This monitors the effectiveness of the controls and catches harm early, countering the gradual, unnoticed nature of hearing damage. So hearing protection (for the remaining noise, required at the upper action value, suitable and properly used) and health surveillance (monitoring for early damage) complete the measures for reducing noise exposure. Together with controlling at source and limiting exposure, they form the approach: reduce the noise, reduce the exposure, protect against what remains, and monitor - protecting workers' hearing from permanent damage. So provide hearing protection where the noise remains and ensure it is used, and provide health surveillance, as the final parts of reducing noise exposure. This is general information, not health-and-safety advice.
A workshop matter
So reducing noise exposure in a workshop means following the hierarchy - controlling the noise at source first (quieter equipment and processes, engineering controls), then limiting exposure (time, distance, organisation), then providing hearing protection where the noise remains (required at the upper action value, suitable and properly used), with health surveillance to monitor - under the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005, which set the exposure values that trigger these duties. This protects workers' hearing from the permanent, irreversible damage that workshop noise can cause - noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus - which is the point of it all. So a workshop with significant noise should assess the noise and reduce the exposure through this hierarchy, both to comply with the regulations and to protect the workers' hearing.
It is worth noting the scope: reducing noise exposure is a workshop and industrial matter more than a kitchen one. A workshop (engineering, manufacturing, with machinery and noisy processes) can be a genuinely noisy environment where noise exposure is a real risk and the noise regulations and this hierarchy of controls apply. A commercial kitchen is not typically a high-noise environment in the same way - kitchens have their own hazards (heat, slips, burns, cuts) but are not usually the sort of high-noise setting where noise exposure is a leading occupational health risk. So this noise guidance is included as general health-and-safety awareness, flagged as a workshop and industrial matter rather than a core kitchen one - relevant where there is significant workplace noise (workshops, industrial settings), less so for a typical kitchen. Where noise is a real risk, though (in a workshop or industrial setting), reducing the exposure through the hierarchy is both a legal duty and essential to protecting workers' hearing from permanent damage. So for a workshop, reduce noise exposure by controlling at source, limiting exposure, and protecting against what remains, under the noise regulations - protecting the workers' hearing. This is general information, not health-and-safety advice; follow the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 and HSE guidance for the specifics.
Questions
Because noise at work can permanently damage hearing - a serious and irreversible harm. Exposure to loud noise over time causes noise-induced hearing loss: a gradual, permanent loss of hearing that builds up from the exposure and does not heal. It can also cause tinnitus (persistent ringing or noise in the ears), often also permanent and distressing. So workshop noise, if not controlled, can leave workers with permanent hearing loss and tinnitus - a real, lasting harm to their health and quality of life. Like other cumulative occupational harms, noise-induced hearing loss builds up gradually, so it can be developing unnoticed until the damage is done, which is why controlling the exposure before the damage matters. Because it is a recognised, serious and preventable harm, noise at work is regulated by the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005, which require employers to assess and reduce the risk and set exposure values triggering specific duties. This is general information, not health-and-safety advice.
The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to assess the risk from noise and reduce it, and set exposure values (daily or weekly personal noise exposure) that trigger duties. The lower exposure action value (80 dB(A)): the employer must assess the risk, provide information and training, and make hearing protection available on request. The upper exposure action value (85 dB(A)): the employer must take action to reduce exposure through controls, provide hearing protection and ensure it is used, designate hearing protection zones, and provide health surveillance. And the exposure limit value (87 dB(A), taking account of any reduction from hearing protection): this must not be exceeded. So the regulations set a framework - assess the noise, and act according to the levels, with duties increasing at the action values and a limit not to be exceeded. The action values are measured at the worker's ear without hearing protection; the limit value takes account of hearing protection. So there is a legal duty to assess and reduce noise exposure, structured around these values. Follow the regulations and HSE guidance for the specifics.
Controlling the noise at source - reducing the noise itself - is the most effective and comes first in the hierarchy, because reducing the noise produced is better than just protecting against it (it reduces exposure for everyone and does not depend on protection being used correctly). Control at source through: quieter equipment and tools (quieter alternatives to noisy ones); quieter processes and methods; and engineering controls (enclosing or isolating noisy machinery, damping vibration, fitting silencers, using barriers, maintaining equipment). This addresses the noise at its origin, reducing the exposure for everyone, which is more effective and reliable than protecting individuals from noise still being produced. Under the regulations, employers must reduce exposure by measures other than hearing protection where reasonably practicable, so controlling at source is part of the legal expectation, with hearing protection as a control where noise cannot be reduced enough otherwise. So look first at how to reduce the noise the workshop produces - which equipment and processes are noisy and how to make them quieter - as the priority. The other measures build on this where noise cannot be fully controlled.
Where noise cannot be fully controlled at source, limit workers' exposure to it through time, distance and organisation. Time: noise exposure depends on loudness and duration, so reducing the time workers spend in the noise reduces their exposure - through job rotation (so no one spends too long in the noise), limiting time on noisy tasks, and scheduling noisy work to minimise exposure. Distance: noise reduces with distance from the source, so increasing the distance between workers and noisy equipment (where the work allows) reduces exposure - keeping workers away from noise sources where possible. Organisation: organising the work and workshop to reduce exposure - separating noisy processes from where people work, positioning noisy equipment away from work areas, scheduling noisy work when fewer people are around. So limiting exposure combines reducing time in noise, increasing distance, and organising the work and workshop - reducing how much noise workers actually receive, even where the noise itself cannot be fully eliminated at source. This is the second tier after controlling at source, and before hearing protection for the noise that remains.
Where the noise still exposes workers to harmful levels after controlling at source and limiting exposure - and it is required at the upper exposure action value. Hearing protection (ear defenders/muffs or earplugs) reduces the noise reaching the worker's ear, protecting their hearing where the noise cannot be reduced enough by other means. Under the regulations, hearing protection must be made available on request at the lower action value (80 dB(A)) and must be provided and its use enforced at the upper action value (85 dB(A)), with hearing protection zones designated. For it to work, it must be suitable (adequate for the noise level), properly used (worn correctly whenever in the noise), and maintained. Importantly, hearing protection is the last resort in the hierarchy, not the first - controlling at source and limiting exposure come first (they reduce the noise itself), whereas hearing protection only protects individuals from noise still there and depends on correct use. So it complements, not replaces, controlling the noise - for the noise remaining after the other controls. Health surveillance (hearing checks) is also required where there is a risk, to catch early signs of damage.
It is a workshop and industrial matter more than a kitchen one. A workshop (engineering, manufacturing, with machinery and noisy processes) can be a genuinely noisy environment where noise exposure is a real risk and the noise regulations and the hierarchy of controls apply. A commercial kitchen is not typically a high-noise environment in the same way - kitchens have their own hazards (heat, slips, burns, cuts) but are not usually the sort of high-noise setting where noise exposure is a leading occupational health risk. So this noise guidance is general health-and-safety awareness, flagged as a workshop and industrial matter rather than a core kitchen one - relevant where there is significant workplace noise (workshops, industrial settings), less so for a typical kitchen. Where noise is a real risk (a workshop or industrial setting), reducing the exposure through the hierarchy (control at source, limit exposure, hearing protection, health surveillance) is both a legal duty under the noise regulations and essential to protecting workers' hearing from permanent damage. This is general information, not health-and-safety advice.
Noise is one workshop occupational-health risk; dust and fume are another, controlled by local exhaust ventilation, which must be tested regularly. Our LEV testing covers the LEV side of workshop occupational-health controls. Ask us about LEV testing for your workshop.
