Home / LEV Testing / Guide
LEV testing - symptoms
If staff working near a process keep reporting headaches - and the headaches ease when they are away from the work - it is worth asking whether the LEV is failing to control an exposure. Symptoms that track with the job are one of the clearest human signals that something in the air is not being controlled, and the extraction is the first thing to check.
The short answer
Headaches among workers near a process - especially headaches that ease when they are away from the work and return when they are back at it - can be a sign of exposure to something in the air that the LEV should be controlling. Many airborne hazards, particularly solvent vapours and some fumes, cause headaches among their effects, so a pattern of headaches that tracks with the job points towards an exposure. If the LEV controlling that exposure has failed or is under-performing, the workers may be breathing more of the hazard than they should. So persistent headaches with that pattern are a genuine reason to check whether the extraction is actually working.
Symptoms are a signal worth heeding
When workers repeatedly report feeling unwell in a way connected to their work, it is a signal worth taking seriously rather than dismissing. Headaches are a common example: if the people working near a particular process keep getting headaches, that is potentially the body registering an exposure to something in the air. Symptoms are, in effect, an early human indicator that a control might not be working - the people relying on the extraction noticing effects that suggest they are breathing something they should not be. Treating that as information rather than coincidence is the right instinct.
The key thing that makes headaches a meaningful signal is the pattern. A headache here and there means little - people get headaches for all sorts of reasons. But headaches that consistently affect the people near a particular process, and especially headaches that ease when those people are away from the work and come back when they return to it, form a pattern that points to the work itself. That work-related pattern is what distinguishes an ordinary headache from a possible symptom of exposure. When the symptoms track with the job like that, they are telling you something about the conditions of the job - and one of the most likely things they are telling you about is the air.
Why headaches point to the air
Headaches are a recognised effect of exposure to a number of airborne hazards, which is why they point towards the air. Solvent vapours are a prime example: breathing solvent vapour commonly causes headaches, along with dizziness and drowsiness, and workplaces using solvents - print rooms, paint and coating processes, cleaning with solvent products - are exactly the kind of place where an exposure would produce this effect. Some fumes and gases likewise cause headaches among their symptoms. So where there is a process releasing an airborne hazard, headaches among the people near it are a plausible sign that they are being exposed to it.
This is precisely the kind of exposure LEV exists to control. The extraction is there to capture the vapour, fume or gas at source so the workers do not breathe it - so if the workers are showing symptoms consistent with breathing it, that raises the question of whether the LEV is doing its job. The symptom and the control are two sides of the same thing: the LEV should be keeping the exposure down, and headaches suggest the exposure may not be down. This is why headaches with a work-related pattern point not just to the air in general but specifically to whether the control of that air is working. The symptoms are a possible sign that the extraction is failing to protect the people it should.
The link to failing extraction
The connection between headaches and the LEV runs through the possibility that the extraction has failed or is under-performing. If an LEV is genuinely controlling an exposure, the workers should not be receiving enough of the hazard to cause symptoms - that is the point of the control. So symptoms consistent with exposure suggest the control may not be holding: the extraction may have declined, lost capture, or never been adequate, letting more of the hazard reach the breathing zone than it should. In this way, headaches can be a downstream warning that the LEV is not working, showing up as an effect on the people before it is caught by anything else.
This matters because LEV fails invisibly, and symptoms can be one of the ways that invisible failure first becomes apparent. A system that has quietly lost performance shows nothing obvious - the fan runs, the system looks fine - but the workers may start to feel the effects of the exposure it is no longer controlling. So a pattern of headaches can be the human early-warning that prompts a check the equipment itself did not. Rather than treating the symptoms and the extraction as separate matters, it is worth connecting them: if the people near a process are getting headaches, the extraction meant to protect them is exactly what should be examined, because their symptoms may be the sign it has stopped doing so.
What to do about it
The right response to a pattern of work-related headaches is to take it seriously and investigate, with the LEV as a prime suspect. That means, first, not dismissing the symptoms - a recurring pattern of headaches tied to a process is a genuine signal, not workers being difficult, and it warrants looking into. And it means checking whether the extraction controlling the relevant exposure is actually working, because if it has failed, that could be the cause. A thorough examination and test measures whether the LEV is genuinely capturing the hazard, which either identifies a failing control to fix or rules the LEV out as the cause.
There is a real value in acting on symptoms this way, because they can catch a problem the routine testing cycle has not yet reached. If workers are feeling the effects of an exposure between scheduled examinations, their symptoms are a reason not to wait for the next test - the possibility that the LEV has failed and is exposing people is worth checking now. Of course, headaches can have other causes, and the LEV may turn out to be fine, in which case the investigation looks elsewhere. But given that failing extraction is a plausible and serious explanation for work-related symptoms of this kind, checking the LEV is the sensible first step. The symptoms are the people telling you to look - and the extraction is where to look first.
The takeaway
Headaches among workers near a process - particularly headaches that ease when they are away from the work and return when they come back - can be a sign of exposure to something in the air that the LEV should be controlling. Many airborne hazards, solvent vapours especially, cause headaches, so a pattern of symptoms that tracks with the job points towards an exposure. And if the extraction meant to control that exposure has failed or is under-performing, the workers may be breathing more of the hazard than they should.
So work-related headaches are a genuine reason to check whether the LEV is actually working - a human early-warning that can catch an invisible failure the equipment shows no sign of. The right response is to take the symptoms seriously rather than dismiss them, and to have the extraction examined, which either finds a failing control to fix or rules it out. Headaches can have other causes, but failing LEV is a plausible and serious one, so the extraction is where to look first. The symptoms are the people telling you to check - so check.
Questions
They can. Headaches among workers near a process, especially ones that ease away from the work and return at it, can be a sign of exposure to something in the air the LEV should be controlling. If the extraction has failed or under-performs, workers may breathe more of the hazard than they should, producing symptoms.
Because headaches are a recognised effect of several airborne hazards - solvent vapours especially, which commonly cause headaches, dizziness and drowsiness, along with some fumes and gases. Where a process releases such a hazard, headaches among the people near it are a plausible sign they are being exposed to it.
One that tracks with the work - headaches consistently affecting the people near a particular process, and especially easing when they are away from the work and returning when they come back. A one-off headache means little; a work-related pattern points to the conditions of the job, including the air.
Because if the LEV were genuinely controlling the exposure, the workers should not receive enough of the hazard to cause symptoms. So symptoms consistent with exposure suggest the control may not be holding - the extraction may have declined or lost capture. Headaches can be a downstream warning that the LEV is not working.
Not necessarily. If workers are feeling the effects of an exposure between examinations, their symptoms are a reason not to wait - the possibility that the LEV has failed and is exposing people is worth checking now. Symptoms can catch a problem the routine testing cycle has not yet reached.
Then the investigation looks elsewhere - headaches can have other causes. But because failing extraction is a plausible and serious explanation for work-related symptoms of this kind, checking the LEV is the sensible first step. A thorough examination either finds a failing control to fix or rules the LEV out as the cause.
If your staff are reporting headaches near a process, our thorough examination checks whether the extraction is genuinely controlling the exposure - finding a failing control to fix, or ruling the LEV out.
